Future In Our Hands
International Network

Cap and Share

Reducing personal carbon emissions

carbon emissions

The figures shown below give an approximation of what average reductions in energy (and hence carbon emissions) might result from UK individuals by taking the following actions:

20 kWh/day – Put on a wooly jumper and turn down your heatings thermostat (to 15 or 17 deg C say). Make sure the heating is off when noone is in the house.

35 kWh/day – Stop flying

20 kWh/day – Drive less. Drive more slowly, drive more gently, car pool, join a car club, walk, use trains and buses. Use an electric car.

4 kWh/day – Change lights to fluorescent or LED

20 kWh/day – Dont buy clutter. Avoid packaging.

10 kWh/day – Eat vegetarian six days out of ten.

5 kWh/day – Eliminate draughts.

10 kWh/day – Double glazing.

10 kWh/day – Improve wall, roof and floor insulation.

8 kWh/day – Solar hot water panels.

5 kWh/day – Photovoltaic panels.

10 kWh/day – Replace fossil fuel heating by ground-source or air-source heat pumps.

The figures above illustrate the importance of reducing travel by car and plane.

fioh.network.logo

 

Reducing carbon emissions

COUNTDOWN PROOF

Each year the devastating effects of  droughts, flooding, rising sea levels and cyclones are increasing.  There is a growing consensus amoung scientists that these severe climate changes are attributable mainly to human created carbon emmissions.  The human abilty to reduce these trends appears to be diminishing with each passing year and economic cost of adapting to climate change compounds the the suffering of the world’s poorest people. How can we respond?

The following book by Michael Thomas (shown here as a pdf document) contains many practical ideas, from the international to the local personal level, for reducing carbon emmissions. He also provides a perspective on the many injustices and negative environmental impacts of global systems of trade and finance.
The book includes some accounts of the author’s own experiences monitoring the overseas projects funded by the two development charities he helped to establish.

The book has 320 pages and is arranged in 10 chapters with a comprehensive bibliography.

COUNTDOWN PROOF

 

fioh.network.logo

The advantages of cycling

The advantages of cycling
swindon-cycle-track-640Why do so many people feel it necessary to acquire cars in the many parts of the affluent world where there are good public transport systems?  Even though the public transport networks are good in these regions, they could be so much better were it not for the congestion caused by far too many cars on the road!
For many the car is regarded as a necessity for both social and work demands and they would think that giving up the car would greatly diminish their quality of life.  The hope is that the following suggestions will prompt a rethink.

oxford-640Whilst poverty and hunger are major causes of ill health for most people in the world, in the rich countries an increasing number of health problems are related to lack of exercise, over eating, drinking excessive alcohol and the over-use of both proscriptive and prescriptive drugs.  These are often refered to the ‘diseases of affluence’ but are also even more common amongst the poorer sections of the affluent society and often related to pollution and a poor diet coupled with lack of exercise.
Most people in the West have come to regard the car as a basic necessity.  Families without cars are now considered to be poor. Sadly this mentality is now spreading to many so called developing countries, especially in South East Asia, thus making transport a growing cause of respiratory health problems and global warming.
For example air pollution in Beijing has reached a crisis level (2015) .

It is hard to understand this love affair with the car given the stress, health problems, pollution, accidents and congestion it causes.  Yes it is often convenient, especially during inclement weather, but do the advantages of car travel outweigh the disadvantages, which include the initial purchase and running costs?   Has the car now become an extension of the home, like a new summerhouse, rather than just a means of getting around?

Congestion, pollution, fatal and serious accidents, environmental and aesthetic degradation are reasons enough to abandon cars as a means of transport, but to these must now be added new direct and indirect links car transport has to ill health, especially of children, and global warming.

For a very small number of people the car may be legitimately be regarded as a necessity.  However, the purpose of this web site is to urge most people, especially young people, to rethink their attitude towards transport and consider the role cycling has in improving health and reducing pollution and carbon dioxide emissions.

Cycling is good for your health and your pocket and the greater the number of people who give up their cars, or decide not to own one in the first place, the safer will be roads for cycling on and the greater the focus on providing safe routes for cyclists.   Also, public transport will become more economically viable and general efficiency will increase for those who must use vehicles for their business activities. Holiday and leisure facilities will become more pleasureable without the environment being spoilt by the presense of large numbers of cars.   Traffic congestion will also be reduced.

Cycling is good for your health
Most able bodied people should be able to use a bike for most journeys under 5 miles (Most car journeys are under 5 miles). Among the likely benefits of regular cycling are:

Cycling can help make you feel good about yourself
Consider for a moment how much better you would feel arriving at the office after an invigorating morning bike ride, rather than a rushed and busy trip through morning traffic.  Or how about at the end of your busy work day, letting all of your stress melt away as you take a leisurely ride home on your bicycle, avoiding the even more stressful rush hour traffic?  It is likely that your trip home wouldn’t take much more time than traveling by car.  Also consider how much time you’ll save by not having to spend so much of it at the health club.  You may even decide to save some money and not sign up for membership during your cycling months.

If the money saving aspect is not all that important to you, consider the environmental benefits.  Bicycling is very environmentally friendly, and you’d be making a measurable contribution to its preservation.  It takes a great deal less of our planet’s resources to build a bicycle than it does to build and maintain a car.  Cyclists do not pollute the air with toxic gases or leak dangerous oil and antifreeze into the earth.  They also do not contribute to the growing problem of grid lock and noise pollution the UK is facing.   And just think how much friendlier people would be to one another if they were all on bicycles.  Think of how much less road rage there would be!

Cycling does not require so much exertion as jogging and can be carried on well into old age.

This may be too obvious to mention, but cycling will save you a lot of money.  The savings from swapping the car, bus or train for a bicycle are considerable.

Cycling can increase efficiency and profits for employers
Employers should consider the benefits they can gain by promoting bicycling, too.  Employees over-all health improves, the number of sick days that your company pays for are likely to decline (and if your employees do get sick, they’ll recover faster).  Medical costs decrease, your employees feel better (physically and emotionally), and they’ll be more effective and happier at their jobs.
Obesity accounts for about 18 million days of sickness absence each year and 30,000 premature deaths.  On average, each person whose death could be attributed to obesity lost nine years of life.  Treating obesity costs the NHS at least 4 billion a year (2011).  The total cost to the UK economy is estimated at £47 bil per year.  Two bil people in the world are overweight and this is likely to increase to a half by 2030.

Problems for cyclists
For some people the decision to abandon the car in favour of a bike requires some courage.  Probably the greatest disincentive to cycling is fear of accidents caused by motorised traffic.  Lack of consideration and yobbish behaviour on the part some people travelling by car towards cyclists can also be a problem.  However, it must also be said that the behaviour of some cyclists (like night riding without lights and inconsiderate behaviour towards pedestrians) can give cyclists a bad name.
There would appear to be a stong case for promoting the use of the bicycle as the primary means of transport for most journeys made across the world and provide more safe cycling routes in urban areas.

cycleloadIf you have ever struggled from a supermarket or city centre with a heavy load of groceries on each arm you might consider how much easier it might have been to carry the same load on a bike.  The picture on the left shows just how many items can be carried with ease on a bicycle – which can be wheeled around with you as you move from one shop to another.

If you think that using a bike for shopping might be time-consuming, then stop to consider the number of times you spent half an hour or more looking for a parking space and then several minutes to find the ticket machine and take the ticket back to your car.

With increasing concerns about global warming and the growing numbers of people with diseases related to obesity and lack of exercise, does it not make sense to use a bicycle for getting around whenever possible?

fiohnet.address

Waste and energy

Energy saving and waste reduction
CHART 12 - EFFICIENCY PARADOXAlthough the following suggestions relate to the UK, the general principles behind them can be applied anywhere in developed countries.

Many quite simple actions can result in considerable savings. Penney Poyzer, in her book ‘No Waste Like Home’, suggests that the average family in the UK wastes £430 worth of food every year.  Another  £200 is spent on wasted energy.

This amounts to a staggering £9 bil that Britons waste on the unnecessary use of energy and good food thrown away every year.

Sadly this waste increases economic growth, but who pays the price!!

These are not the only causes of waste in the home.  If all the possible savings are added up for the average family, these could amount to as much as £4,000 each year – £60 bil for the UK as a whole.  On average people throw away 7 times their own body weight each year.

All of this waste does of course add to global warming.  In 50 years time, as a result of rising temperatures, UN scientists estimate that there will be 10,000 more cases of food poisoning, 5,000 more deaths from skin cancer and 2,000 more cataract operations each year in Britain.  Note that this is in addition to the fears that many scientists predict about the effects of global warming which include the possibility of an ice age developing in northern Europe as a result of the Gulf Stream being effectively ‘cut-off’ – an outcome of melting ice in the Arctic.

When we look at some basic statistics, the role we can play in reducing waste and helping the environment can seem obvious.  All we need is the will to make the necessary response.  Each year in Britain:

The cost of managing household waste is £1.6 bil and this is expected to rise to £3.2 bil by 2020.  Of the 7,000 incinerators, 12 burn municipal waste.
20% of what comes through the letterbox is never opened and 60% is never read.

What can be done?
Here are some suggestions:

fiohnet.address

Energy saving and carbon reduction

Energy saving and carbon reduction

Solar PV panels

Solar PV panels

Most energy is derived from fossil fuels and hence any personal savings in the use of energy will reduce carbon emmissions.
Two methods of representing proportional household emissions in the UK are shown in the following charts:

uk-carbon-emmissions

The figures shown are for 2006 when the average per capita emmission was 11.6 tonnes, half of which was from direct personal emmissions – air travel 34%; household heating 26%; car use 19%; Household electricity 16%; other transport use 5%.
Emmisssions outside the household but related to househjold activities – Manufacturing and construction 40%; personal travel 29%; housing 20%; services 6%; food 5%.

The figures show that 5 tonnes (out of the total of 11.6) are caused by travel and 2.3 tonnes by manufacturing and construction.
Household electricity accounts for about 0.9 tonne and household heating 1.5 tonnes.  Hence the greatest reductions are to be made from reducing travel.   The impact of international air flights can be determined from the CHOOSE CLIMATE CALCULATOR .

Return flight from London to Douala (Cameroon) - 4995 km

Return flight from London to Douala (Cameroon) – 4995 km

The diagram on the left shows the results from the calculator for a return flight from London to Douala (Cameroon) – a distance of 4,995 km.  Note that this resulted in a per capita emission of approximately 3.5 tonnes.
Greenhouse gas emissions from aircraft flying in and out of Britain in 2030 are estimated to then contribute nearly half the UK total.  Aircraft from UK airports alone emitted 9.8 million tonnes of carbon in 2005 – equivalent to 36 million tonnes of carbon dioxide.

What level of emissions should we be aiming for? Dr Hillman, Senior Fellow Emeritas at the Policy Studies Institute (2010) suggests levels shown in the following table (note that the target for 2005 was not achieved) :

hillman-target
An idea of household and individual annual carbon emissions can also be obtained by measuring gas and energy use in Kw hrs, heating oil in litres and transport in Km then using the following chart:

home-carbon-emissionsDo not include miles travelled as a passenger in a car

Another assessment can be made with this CARBON CALCULATOR

Further information can be obtained from the National Energy Foundation

Anyone considering solar heating might find the following links useful:

SOLAR ENERGY

FEED-IN TARIFF

CURRENT FEED-IN TARIFF RATES

There is also information on ENERGY EFFICIENT HOMES and CARBON FOOTPRINTING on the National Energy Foundation web site.

fiohnet.address

Ethical investment

ethical.investment. Fair trade logo

 

Ethical investment
An increasing number of individuals are concerned that the money they invest is not used to support governments and organisations:

  1.  that do not uphold basic human rights
  2.  that produce indiscriminate weapons or weapons sent to oppressive regimes or torture equipment
  3.  that advocate discrimination and incitement to hatred
  4.  that take an irresponsible approach to the payment of tax
  5.  whose core business focuses on irresponsible gambling
  6.  whose core business is the provision of payday loans
  7.  whose core activity contributes to climate change via the extraction of fossil fuels and certain biofuels
  8. that manufacture of chemicals that are persistent in the   environment, bio-accumulative in nature or linked to long-term health concerns
  9.  that harvest natural resources, including fish and timber, unsustainably
  10.  that develop genetically modified organisms where there is evidence of uncontrolled release into the environment, negative impacts on developing countries or patenting e.g. of indigenous knowledge
  11. that develop nanotechnology in circumstances that risk damaging the environment or compromising human health
  12.  that fail to implement basic labout rights and the rights of workers to freedom of association e.g. in a trade union
  13. that impede acces to safe drinking water or vital medicines
  14. that engage in irresponsible marketing practices e.g. with regard to tobacco products and manufacture.

These are a summary of some of the commitments in the Ethical Policy of the UK Co-operative Bank developed after concerns following the near collapse of the bank due to financial mismanagement and its ownership by mainly US hedge funds.  This showed a commitment to the pre-crisis policy.  The Co-operative Group now owns only 20% of the bank.
The bank also states that it will seek to support businesses involved in developing alternatives to animal experimentation and farming methods that promote animal welfare.  There are also commitments to support projects which protect the environment and international development and social development in the UK.  The complete policy can be seen here:
coop-bank-ethical-policy

Many may feel that these commitments do not go far enough, but at least they can form the basis for assessment of the bank’s ethical performance in the future.  Also, the Co-operative Bank as of 2015  is the only high street bank with a clearly articulated ethical policy.

However, the Bank is ranked only 24th for its ethical performance in the Ethical Consumer

Top ten ranking:

  1.  Ecology Building Society
  2. Charity Bank
  3. Triodos Bank
  4. Cumberland Building Society
  5. Principality Building Society
  6. Coventry Building Society
  7. Leeds Building Society
  8. Newcastle Building Society
  9. Metrobank
  10. West Bromwich Building Society

The Triodos Bank has a high rating but potential customers should be aware of its links to the ideas of Rudolf Steiner and his occult religion/movement he named anthroposophy In its Articles of Association it states  “Triodos Bank is – at its sole discretion – associated with anthroposophy, this being the humanities science initiated by Rudolf Steiner that accordingly forms an important basis for the work of Triodos Bank”.

The bank supports Waldorf/Steiner schools, biodynamic farming and Camphill communities and has links to a biodynamic organisation

The FIOH Fund uses the Co-operative Bank and the Ecology Building Society

fiohnet.address